代码之家 › 专栏 › 技术社区 › ethan.roday

Typescript推断执行具有相同参数签名的可选函数参数的高阶函数的类型

conditional-types generics typescript javascript

0

ethan.roday · 技术社区 · 7 年前

假设我有一个函数,它包含两个函数 f 和 g 作为参数,并返回执行的函数 F F 和 G 有相同的签名。使用条件类型很容易做到这一点:

type ArgumentTypes<F extends Function> = F extends (...args: infer A) => any ? A : never;
function functionPair<
    F extends (...args: any[]) => any,
    G extends (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => any
>
(f: F, g: G): (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => { f: ReturnType<F>, g: ReturnType<G> }
{
    return (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => ({ f: f(...args), g: g(...args) });
}

functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: number) => bar); // Error, incompatible signatures, as expected
functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: string) => bar.length); // (foo: string) => { f: string; g: number; }, as expected

现在, F 和 G 可选择的 ,并且返回对象的形状是否因此而改变?也就是说,如果 F 是 undefined

functionPair(); // Should be () => {}
functionPair(undefined, undefined); // Should be () => {}
functionPair((foo: string) => foo); // Should be (foo: string) => { f: string }
functionPair(undefined, (bar: string) => foo.length); // Should be (bar: string) => { g: number }
functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: string) => foo.length); // Should be (foo: string) => { f: string, g: number }, as before

我一直试图用条件类型来实现这一点,但在有条件地强制执行结果函数的形状时遇到了一些问题。以下是我到目前为止所做的(严格的空检查已关闭):

function functionPair<
    A extends F extends undefined ? G extends undefined ? [] : ArgumentTypes<G> : ArgumentTypes<F>,
    F extends (...args: any[]) => any = undefined,
    G extends F extends undefined ? (...args: any[]) => any : (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => any = undefined
>
(f?: F, g?: G): (...args: A) =>
    F extends undefined
    ? G extends undefined ? {} : { g: ReturnType<G> }
    : G extends undefined ? { f: ReturnType<F> } : { f: ReturnType<F>, g: ReturnType<G> }
{ /* implementation... */ }

const a = functionPair(); // () => {}, as expected
const b = functionPair((foo: string) => foo); // (foo: string) => { f: string; }, as expected
const c = functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: number) => bar); // Error, incompatible signatures, as expected
const d = functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: string) => bar.length); // (foo: string) => { f: string; g: number; }, as expected

const e = functionPair(undefined, undefined); // INCORRECT! Expected () => {}, got (...args: unknown[] | []) => {} | { f: any; } | { g: any; } | { f: any; g: any; }
const f = functionPair(undefined, (bar: string) => bar.length); // INCORRECT! Expected (bar: string) => { g: number; } but got (...args: unknown[] | [string]) => { g: number; } | { f: any; g: number; }

function functionPairOverloaded(): () => {}
function functionPairOverloaded(f: undefined, g: undefined): () => {}
function functionPairOverloaded<F extends (...args: any[]) => any>(f: F): (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => { f: ReturnType<F> }
function functionPairOverloaded<G extends (...args: any[]) => any>(f: undefined, g: G): (...args: ArgumentTypes<G>) => { g: ReturnType<G> }
function functionPairOverloaded<F extends (...args: any[]) => any, G extends (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => any>(f: F, g: G): (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => { f: ReturnType<F>, g: ReturnType<G> }
function functionPairOverloaded<F extends (...args: any[]) => any, G extends (...args: any[]) => any>(f?: F, g?: G) { /* implementation... */ }

1 回复 | 直到 7 年前

1

2

jcalz 7 年前

假设你有 --strictNullChecks 打开后,我想我会这样做:

type Fun = (...args: any[]) => any;
type FunFrom<F, G> = F extends Fun ? F : G extends Fun ? G : () => {};
type IfFun<F, T> = F extends Fun ? T : never;
type Ret<T> = T extends (...args: any[]) => infer R ? R : never

declare function functionPair<
  F extends Fun | undefined = undefined,
  G extends ((...args: (F extends Fun ? Parameters<F> : any[])) => any) 
    | undefined = undefined
>(
  f?: F, 
  g?: G
): (...args: Parameters<FunFrom<F, G>>) => {
  [K in IfFun<F, 'f'> | IfFun<G, 'g'>]: K extends 'f' ? Ret<F> : Ret<G> 
};

这相当难看,但它确实给了你想要的行为:

const a = functionPair(); // () => {}, as expected
const b = functionPair((foo: string) => foo); // (foo: string) => { f: string; }, as expected
const c = functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: number) => bar); // Error, incompatible signatures, as expected
const d = functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: string) => bar.length); // (foo: string) => { f: string; g: number; }, as expected
const e = functionPair(undefined, undefined); // () => {}, as expected
const f = functionPair(undefined, (bar: string) => bar.length); // (bar: string) => { g: number; }, as expected

F 和 G 而不是 A 使用 Parameters<FunFrom<F, G>> . 注意 Parameters ArgumentTypes .

另外,对于返回函数的返回类型,我做了一个有点难看的映射类型。我首先计划做一些类似的事情 IfFun<F, {f: Ret<F>}> & IfFun<G, {g: Ret<G>}> ,这(我相信)更容易理解,但结果是 {f: X, g: Y} 比十字路口好 {f: X} & {g: Y} .

不管怎样,希望这有帮助。祝你好运

--严格的零支票 关闭后,定义变得更加复杂:

type Fun = (...args: any[]) => any;
type AsFun<F> = [F] extends [Fun] ? F : never
type FunFrom<F, G> = AsFun<IfFun<F, F, IfFun<G, G, () => {}>>>;
type IfFun<F, Y, N=never> = F extends undefined ? N : 
  0 extends (1 & F) ? N : F extends Fun ? Y : N;
type Ret<T> = T extends (...args: any[]) => infer R ? R : never

declare function functionPair<
  F extends Fun | undefined = undefined,
  G extends ((...args: IfFun<F, Parameters<F>, any[]>) => any)
  | undefined = undefined
  >(
    f?: F,
    g?: G
  ): (...args: Parameters<FunFrom<F, G>>) => {
    [K in IfFun<F, 'f'> | IfFun<G, 'g'>]: K extends 'f' ? Ret<F> : Ret<G>
  };

区别在于 IfFun<> 需要能够区分功能和 undefined 和 any ,当您关机时,这两个选项都会在不幸的地方弹出 --严格的零支票 undefined extends Function ? true : false 开始返回 true ,及当您通过手册时开始推断将值转换为函数。辨别 未定义 Function extends undefined ? true : false false ,但有区别 任何 funny business .

祝你好运!