我有一个
Box<dyn Any>
我知道底层的类型,所以我想在
Box::downcast()
(
source
).
首先我试着
std::hint::unreachable_unchecked()
pub unsafe fn downcast() -> Box<i32> {
let value = any();
if let Ok(value) = value.downcast() {
value
} else {
std::hint::unreachable_unchecked()
}
}
和
pub unsafe fn downcast() -> Box<i32> {
any().downcast().map_err(|_| std::hint::unreachable_unchecked()).unwrap()
}
具有
rustc -C opt-level=3
两者的结果都是(省略40行):
example::downcast:
push rbx
sub rsp, 16
call any@PLT
mov rbx, rax
mov qword ptr [rsp], rax
mov qword ptr [rsp + 8], rdx
mov rdi, rax
call qword ptr [rdx + 24]
mov rax, rbx
add rsp, 16
pop rbx
ret
mov rbx, rax
mov rdi, rsp
call core::ptr::drop_in_place
mov rdi, rbx
call _Unwind_Resume@PLT
ud2
因为这不是我想要的优化,所以我尝试了
pub unsafe fn downcast() -> Box<i32> {
let value = any();
std::intrinsics::assume(value.is::<i32>());
value.downcast().unwrap()
}
但情况更糟(省略118行):
example::downcast:
push r15
push r14
push rbx
sub rsp, 32
call any@PLT
mov rbx, rax
mov r14, rdx
mov qword ptr [rsp], rax
mov qword ptr [rsp + 8], rdx
mov r15, qword ptr [rdx + 24]
mov rdi, rax
call r15
mov qword ptr [rsp + 16], rbx
mov qword ptr [rsp + 24], r14
mov rdi, rbx
call r15
movabs rcx, -5015437470765251660 ;TypeId::of::<i32>()
cmp rax, rcx
jne .LBB5_7
mov rax, rbx
add rsp, 32
pop rbx
pop r14
pop r15
ret
.LBB5_7:
mov rdi, rbx
mov rsi, r14
call core::result::unwrap_failed
ud2
mov rbx, rax
lea rdi, [rsp + 16]
call core::ptr::drop_in_place
mov rdi, rbx
call _Unwind_Resume@PLT
ud2
mov rbx, rax
mov rdi, rsp
call core::ptr::drop_in_place
mov rdi, rbx
call _Unwind_Resume@PLT
ud2
我希望生成这样的代码,这是
Ok
手臂从
Box::downcast
pub unsafe fn downcast() -> Box<i32> {
let value = any();
let raw: *mut dyn Any = Box::into_raw(value);
Box::from_raw(raw as *mut i32)
}
这就导致了(
零
行(省略):
example::downcast:
push rax
call any@PLT
pop rcx
ret
为什么编译器不能以这种方式优化代码?
所有组件
generated by godbolt