代码之家 › 专栏 › 技术社区 › bobber205

生产者/消费者实施-需要反馈

producer-consumer multithreading boost c++

bobber205 · 技术社区 · 16 年前

很久没做了所以我很好奇你们怎么看?我应该补充什么,使它成为一个更好的例子等。感谢您的反馈!:)

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
boost::mutex bufferMutex;
deque<int> buffer;
const int maxBufferSize = 5;
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

bool AddToBuffer(int i)
{
    if (buffer.size() < maxBufferSize)
    {
        buffer.push_back(i);
        return true;
    }
    else
    {       
        return false;
    }
}

bool GetFromBuffer(int& toReturn)
{
    if (buffer.size() == 0)
    {
        return false;
    }
    else
    {
        toReturn = buffer[buffer.size()-1];
        buffer.pop_back();
        return true;
    }
}

struct Producer 
{
    int ID;
    void operator()()
    {
        while (true)
        {
            boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(bufferMutex);
            int num = dice();
            bool result = AddToBuffer(num);
            lock.unlock();
            //safe area done
            if (result)
            {
                cout << "Producer " << this->ID << " Added " << num << endl;
            }
            else
            {
                cout << "!!Buffer was Full!!" << endl;
            }
            //Added
            //Now wait
            boost::xtime xt;
            xtime_get( &xt, boost::TIME_UTC);
            xt.nsec += 1000000 + 100000 * (rand() % 1000);
            boost::thread::sleep(xt);
        }
    }
};

struct Consumer 
{
    int ID;
    void operator()()
    {
        while (true)
        {
            int returnedInt = 0;
            boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(bufferMutex);
            bool result = GetFromBuffer(returnedInt);
            lock.unlock();
            //safe area done
            if (result)
            {
                cout << "\tConsumer " << this->ID << " Took Out " << returnedInt << endl;
            }
            else
            {
                cout << "!!Buffer was Empty!!" << endl;
            }
            //Added
            //Now wait
            boost::xtime xt;
            xtime_get( &xt, boost::TIME_UTC);
            xt.nsec += 1000000 + 100000 * (rand() % 1000);
            boost::thread::sleep(xt);
        }
    }
};



void main()
{
    Producer p, p2;
    Consumer c, c2;

    p.ID = 1;
    p2.ID = 2;

    c.ID = 1;
    c2.ID = 2;

    boost::thread thread1(boost::ref(p));
    boost::thread thread2(boost::ref(c));
    boost::thread thread3(boost::ref(p2));
    boost::thread thread4(boost::ref(c2));

    int x;
    cin >> x;
}

1 回复 | 直到 16 年前

Michael Aaron Safyan 16 年前

如果您已经在AddToBuffer和GetFromBuffer之类的调用中包装了缓冲区对象,那么在包装器函数中设置锁会更有意义。此外,您正在显式调用unlock,这完全违背了作用域锁定的目的;作用域锁定使用资源获取is初始化(RAII)来获取和释放锁。更好的用法是将关键部分放在块中,这样由于锁超出作用域而释放互斥锁,而不是由于显式调用unlock函数,因为作用域不那么脆弱。例如:

// Code that doesn't need locking
{
    boost::mutex::scoped_lock lck(bufferMutex); // Lock is acquired here
    // Code that needs to be synchronized
} // Lock is automatically released here without explicit call to unlock()
// More code that doesn't need locking