![]() |
1
3
Probably slightly faster with the loop inside the function, as there is a (slight) cost to each function call. However, it won't make much difference. 这真的是过早的优化,而且 the root of all evil . You should write it so it is clear, then if it's too slow, figure out where it's slow and optimize that. |
![]() |
2
0
This is the kind of micro-optimization that most likely does not matter. Do whatever leads to cleaner code.
|
![]() |
3
0
They are essentially the same, and any time execution difference will be negliable. It comes down to preference. |
![]() |
4
0
I dont think there would be much of a difference between the two anyway, but from what I recollect of function stack calling, the first method should take longer. |
![]() |
5
0
In every language I know, using loops is faster, because of the operations involved when calling a function (like adding it to the stack). However, you should not think about the performance before the actual performance issues arise. Think in terms of design, code clarity, and low maintenance efforts. |
![]() |
6
0
简而言之:第二个应该更快。
|
![]() |
BlurKid · R中for循环时结果的奇怪差异 9 月前 |
![]() |
bigjdawg43 · 迭代多个数据帧中的列并有条件地执行操作 1 年前 |
![]() |
xhamsterIT · 循环VBA Microsoft Excel 1 年前 |
![]() |
Nico44044 · 使用for循环遍历Django模型字段 1 年前 |
![]() |
chanbo chung · 如何在聚合中获得所有可能的组合 1 年前 |
|
Himanshu · 无法在逐行二进制搜索中迭代2D数组中的所有行 1 年前 |
|
stephr · 循环为多个变量选择最接近另一个日期的日期 1 年前 |