包装器库-生成器与带POCO的工厂

public class COMPoint
{
    internal COMPoint(MyComObject comobject) {}
    public SomeCollection Nodes {get; set;} 
}

现在为了在我的COM对象中创建point对象,我需要调用一些字符串命令,而这正是我在决定指向何处时遇到的问题。

现在我考虑使用一个具有属性的POCO,然后将其传递到某种工厂方法中,类似这样的方法;

public class Point
{
   public SomeCollection Nodes {get;set;}
}

public class GeometryFactory
{
   public GeometryFactory(MyComObject comobject) {}
   public CreateCOMPointFrom(Point point)
   {
      // Do COM work here and return new COMPoint.
   }
}

或者使用生成器模式,例如:

public class COMPoint
{
    internal COMPoint(MyComObject comobject) {}
    public SomeCollection Nodes {get; set;} 

   public class Builder
   {
      public Builder(MyComObject comobject) {}
      public SomeCollection Nodes {get; set;}
      public COMPoint Create()
      {
         // Do COM work here and return new COMPoint.
      }
   }
}

或两者的结合:

public class COMPoint
{
    internal COMPoint(MyComObject comobject) {}
    public SomeCollection Nodes {get; set;} 

   public class Builder
   {
      public Builder(MyComObject comobject) {}
      public SomeCollection Nodes {get; set;}
      public COMPoint Create()
      {
         // Do COM work here and return new COMPoint.
      }

      public COMPoint CreateFrom(Point point)
      {
         // Set builder properties and call.
         this.Create();
      }
   }
}

Point point = new Point()
point.Nodes <- Set nodes

将它传递给他们的代码,然后构造它,并返回返回到COM对象的代码。

我担心,如果我有两个不同的点对象,它可能会混淆用户,但再次建设者模式是不是真的很友好,嗯,怎么办。

当然,point对象是我必须创建的最简单的对象,还有很多更复杂的对象。